🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include functions where Black people are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A effort to remove Black history and legacy from the records is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance symbolises how little it can be effective if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.